
Welcome to Dark Markets, your weekly update on the crimes and manipulations of Effective Altruists, Rationalists, Eugenicists, Singularitarians, and other Silicon Valley moonbats. I’m David Z. Morris, longtime investigator, PhD scholar, and author of Stealing the Future, a book about the fraud endemic to Effective Altruism and Silicon Valley.
Quick recommendations: be sure to read Andrew Orlowski on the fraud of “rogue” AI incidents, and Nafeez Amed on the Peter Thiel-backed Cambridge-Oxford race-science network that killed Jason Arday. And if you can, help Gil Duran push back against deplatforming by YouTube.
***
The Wall Street Journal has profiled Cami Clark, wife of Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei. What’s most notable is in the piece’s headline: Her existence has been meticulously scrubbed not merely from the internet where AIs have harvested everyone else’s data, but from the models themselves:
Amodei’s own creation, Claude, has no idea who his wife is.
On its face, one could argue this is just overzealous security for the wife of a very important CEO. But the deeper truth seems to be that hiding Cami Clark is about hiding some of Anthropic’s own dark connections - including to none other than Jeffrey Epstein.


·
June 9, 2024
I’ve worked to highlight a key scandalous fact: Anthropic was funded substantially with stolen money.
In 2021, Sam Bankman-Fried put $500 million into the then-nascent company. According to forensic accounting at his criminal trial, this investment was entirely funded with stolen customer assets. And it was almost all of the money Anthropic raised that year: its “Series B” totalled $580 billion, so it was 86% dirty money.
We’ve always known Amodei was linked to Effective Altruism, but the profile of his wife makes this explicit: It describes Clark and Amodei socializing with lead Effective Altruism funder Dustin Moskovitz and his wife Cari Tuna circa 2018.

Anthropic might not exist today if not for the fraud that flowed through Effective Altruism. And now we’re seeing the deceptive behaviors baked into EA’s ethical framework emerge in the operation of Anthropic and OpenAI, such as in their recent deceptive presentation of hacking incidents.
And then there’s the Epstein connection.

·
Feb 3
I’ve been relaxed about pitching the premium Dark Markets tier. You get regular exclusive previews of my future books and subscriber-only essays, but generally premium has been a way for a few friends and allies to chip in voluntarily as I noodled about continental philosophy and finance.
That has changed.
My niche interest has become part of a much larger battle.
Subscribe
When I wrote Stealing the Future, I was afraid it would be instantly obsolete. Instead, it has only become more important, and I find myself part of a movement of critical thinkers unpacking Silicon Valley’s bags. Alongside writers like Gil Duran, Emille Torres, Andrew Orlowski, and many others, I am working to expose dangerous ideas and active frauds.
If you care about the capture of the U.S. government by right-wing tech authoritarians, consider pledging your support to one of us. In my case, it would support not just what you see here on Dark Markets, but also my broader reporting on things like Jeffrey Epstein’s crypto ties, the cognitive harms of AI use, and intellectual gag orders accompanying Effective Altruist grants.
Your help will make a difference.
Subscribe
Amazingly, Cami Clark’s appearance in the Epstein files was noticed by a few of us when they were released early this year - not because anyone knew she was Amodei’s wife, but because she was doing something so incredibly fucking weird:
She asked Jeffrey Epstein, convicted sex trafficker of minors, to help fund an “ethical luxury porn” company called Eddice, after first inviting him to dinner.
Clark was reportedly introduced by John Brockman, a science publisher who acted as a science gatekeeper to Epstein during the 2008-2019 period. Brockman’s appearance highlights the metagame here: Science publishing was an early leg of the mini-information empire created by Robert Maxwell (father of Ghislaine) who predicted the boom in the value of information decades before Clive Humby declared that “data is the new oil.”
This connects Anthropic to a long-term elite project of population data collection and cybernetic social control.

·
Jun 10
At the end of August, readers who have made three referrals to new subscribers (across time) will be entered into a drawing for a (physical) copy of Hayek’s Bastards: Race, Gold, IQ, and the Capitalism of the Far Right, an invaluable dive into the hidden psychology of hard money and free markets. I’ll have a review soon.
Every time you click the “Share” or “Refer a Friend” buttons in a post, and every time you restack a post, Substack tracks your sharing. If that sharing results in a subscription, you get one of your three referral credits.
As an added bonus, you also still only need to refer two free subscribers to get a month of free premium access.
(Paying premium supporters at the end of the month will get one drawing entry by default, and two additional entries per referral reward.)
Effective Altruists and “Rationalists” make good candidates for recruitment into this project: as we’ve seen in recent days, and first saw clearly with Sam Bankman-Fried, they are very willing to lie to the public if they can be convinced it serves a “greater good.”
They are, at the same time, as a group quite subservient to authority, which they measure largely by wealth. They also, perhaps thanks to their broad social alienation, seem to need the emotional reassurance of moving in groups. As much as the “movement” may pitch itself as iconoclastic, young Effective Altruists are being trained and financially motivated to think like everyone else around them - and that means seeing yourself as a genetically superior individual with the right to take power over the unwashed masses.

·
June 18, 2024
Epstein, who had begun to work hard to massage his public image after his Florida conviction, replied that he couldn’t be associated with porn. But the fact that Clark would ask him affirms our picture of “Effective Altruism” and the “AI Safety” movement as strategic fictions deployed by people with very little intuitive grasp of basic human ethics.
Clark’s interest in feminist porn itself aligns broadly with the contractual “polyamory” so widespread in Silicon Valley, with its emphasis on contract-based relationships and tendency to mask abuse behind that hierarchical contractualism.
Her willingness to involve Epstein points to just how far this redefinition of normality can be stretched. We already know that ped*philia is disturbingly common as a thought experiment for “rationalists” looking for entertainingly scandalous ideas, and abuse of adult women is seemingly rampant and possibly systematic.

·
January 8, 2025
So these are the people selling AI. It seems possible they aren’t trustworthy.
Subscribe